/usr/share/doc/gnupg-doc/GNU_Privacy_Handbook/html/x335.htm is in gnupg-doc 2003.04.06+dak1-1ubuntu1.
This file is owned by root:root, with mode 0o644.
The actual contents of the file can be viewed below.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 | <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN""http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
<HTML
><HEAD
><TITLE
>Validating other keys on your public keyring</TITLE
><META
NAME="GENERATOR"
CONTENT="Modular DocBook HTML Stylesheet Version 1.79"><LINK
REL="HOME"
TITLE="The GNU Privacy Handbook"
HREF="book1.htm"><LINK
REL="UP"
TITLE="Key Management"
HREF="c236.htm"><LINK
REL="PREVIOUS"
TITLE="Key Management"
HREF="c236.htm"><LINK
REL="NEXT"
TITLE="Distributing keys"
HREF="x464.htm"></HEAD
><BODY
CLASS="SECT1"
BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF"
TEXT="#000000"
LINK="#0000FF"
VLINK="#840084"
ALINK="#0000FF"
><DIV
CLASS="NAVHEADER"
><TABLE
SUMMARY="Header navigation table"
WIDTH="100%"
BORDER="0"
CELLPADDING="0"
CELLSPACING="0"
><TR
><TH
COLSPAN="3"
ALIGN="center"
>The GNU Privacy Handbook</TH
></TR
><TR
><TD
WIDTH="10%"
ALIGN="left"
VALIGN="bottom"
><A
HREF="c236.htm"
ACCESSKEY="P"
>Prev</A
></TD
><TD
WIDTH="80%"
ALIGN="center"
VALIGN="bottom"
>Chapter 3. Key Management</TD
><TD
WIDTH="10%"
ALIGN="right"
VALIGN="bottom"
><A
HREF="x464.htm"
ACCESSKEY="N"
>Next</A
></TD
></TR
></TABLE
><HR
ALIGN="LEFT"
WIDTH="100%"></DIV
><DIV
CLASS="SECT1"
><H1
CLASS="SECT1"
><A
NAME="AEN335"
>Validating other keys on your public keyring</A
></H1
><P
>In Chapter <A
HREF="c15.htm"
>1</A
> a procedure was given to validate your
correspondents' public keys: a correspondent's key is validated by
personally checking his key's fingerprint and then signing his public
key with your private key.
By personally checking the fingerprint you can be sure that the
key really does belong to him, and since you have signed they key, you
can be sure to detect any tampering with it in the future.
Unfortunately, this procedure is awkward when either you must validate
a large number of keys or communicate with people whom you do not
know personally.</P
><P
>GnuPG addresses this problem with a mechanism popularly known
as the <I
CLASS="FIRSTTERM"
>web of trust</I
>.
In the web of trust model, responsibility for validating public
keys is delegated to people you trust.
For example, suppose
<P
></P
><UL
COMPACT="COMPACT"
><LI
><P
>Alice has signed Blake's key, and</P
></LI
><LI
><P
>Blake has signed Chloe's key and Dharma's key.</P
></LI
></UL
>
If Alice trusts Blake to properly validate keys that he signs, then
Alice can infer that Chloe's and Dharma's keys are valid without
having to personally check them.
She simply uses her validated copy of Blake's public key to
check that Blake's signatures on Chloe's and Dharma's are good.
In general, assuming that Alice fully trusts everybody to properly
validate keys they sign, then any key signed by a valid key is also
considered valid.
The root is Alice's key, which is axiomatically assumed to be valid.</P
><DIV
CLASS="SECT2"
><H2
CLASS="SECT2"
><A
NAME="AEN346"
>Trust in a key's owner</A
></H2
><P
>In practice trust is subjective.
For example, Blake's key is valid to Alice since she signed it, but she
may not trust Blake to properly validate keys that he signs.
In that case, she would not take Chloe's and Dharma's key as valid
based on Blake's signatures alone.
The web of trust model accounts for this by associating with each
public key on your keyring an indication of how much you trust the
key's owner.
There are four trust levels.
<P
></P
><DIV
CLASS="VARIABLELIST"
><DL
><DT
>unknown</DT
><DD
><P
>Nothing is known about the owner's judgment in key signing.
Keys on your public keyring that you do not own initially have
this trust level.</P
></DD
><DT
>none</DT
><DD
><P
>The owner is known to improperly sign other keys.</P
></DD
><DT
>marginal</DT
><DD
><P
>The owner understands the implications of key signing and
properly validates keys before signing them.</P
></DD
><DT
>full</DT
><DD
><P
>The owner has an excellent understanding of key signing,
and his signature on a key would be as good as your own.</P
></DD
></DL
></DIV
>
A key's trust level is something that you alone assign to the
key, and it is considered private information.
It is not packaged with the key when it is exported; it is even
stored separately from your keyrings in a separate database.</P
><P
>The GnuPG key editor may be used to adjust your trust in a key's owner.
The command is <B
CLASS="COMMAND"
>trust</B
>.
In this example Alice edits her trust in Blake and then updates
the trust database to recompute which keys are valid based on her new
trust in Blake.
<PRE
CLASS="SCREEN"
><TT
CLASS="PROMPT"
>alice%</TT
> <KBD
CLASS="USERINPUT"
>gpg --edit-key blake</KBD
>
pub 1024D/8B927C8A created: 1999-07-02 expires: never trust: q/f
sub 1024g/C19EA233 created: 1999-07-02 expires: never
(1) Blake (Executioner) <blake@cyb.org>
<TT
CLASS="PROMPT"
>Command></TT
> <KBD
CLASS="USERINPUT"
>trust</KBD
>
pub 1024D/8B927C8A created: 1999-07-02 expires: never trust: q/f
sub 1024g/C19EA233 created: 1999-07-02 expires: never
(1) Blake (Executioner) <blake@cyb.org>
Please decide how far you trust this user to correctly
verify other users' keys (by looking at passports,
checking fingerprints from different sources...)?
1 = Don't know
2 = I do NOT trust
3 = I trust marginally
4 = I trust fully
s = please show me more information
m = back to the main menu
<TT
CLASS="PROMPT"
>Your decision?</TT
> <KBD
CLASS="USERINPUT"
>3</KBD
>
pub 1024D/8B927C8A created: 1999-07-02 expires: never trust: m/f
sub 1024g/C19EA233 created: 1999-07-02 expires: never
(1) Blake (Executioner) <blake@cyb.org>
<TT
CLASS="PROMPT"
>Command></TT
> <KBD
CLASS="USERINPUT"
>quit</KBD
>
[...]</PRE
>
Trust in the key's owner and the key's validity are indicated to the
right when the key is displayed.
Trust in the owner is displayed first and the key's validity is
second<A
NAME="AEN378"
HREF="#FTN.AEN378"
><SPAN
CLASS="footnote"
>[1]</SPAN
></A
>.
The four trust/validity levels are abbreviated: unknown (<TT
CLASS="LITERAL"
>q</TT
>),
none (<TT
CLASS="LITERAL"
>n</TT
>), marginal (<TT
CLASS="LITERAL"
>m</TT
>), and
full (<TT
CLASS="LITERAL"
>f</TT
>).
In this case, Blake's key is fully valid since Alice signed it herself.
She initially has an unknown trust in Blake to properly sign other keys
but decides to trust him marginally.</P
></DIV
><DIV
CLASS="SECT2"
><H2
CLASS="SECT2"
><A
NAME="AEN385"
>Using trust to validate keys</A
></H2
><P
>The web of trust allows a more elaborate algorithm to be used to
validate a key.
Formerly, a key was considered valid only if you signed it personally.
A more flexible algorithm can now be used: a key <I
CLASS="EMPHASIS"
>K</I
> is considered valid
if it meets two conditions:
<P
></P
><OL
COMPACT="COMPACT"
TYPE="1"
><LI
><P
>it is signed by enough valid keys, meaning
<P
></P
><UL
COMPACT="COMPACT"
><LI
><P
>you have signed it personally,</P
></LI
><LI
><P
>it has been signed by one fully trusted key, or</P
></LI
><LI
><P
>it has been signed by three marginally trusted keys; and</P
></LI
></UL
></P
></LI
><LI
><P
>the path of signed keys leading from <I
CLASS="EMPHASIS"
>K</I
> back
to your own key is five steps or shorter.</P
></LI
></OL
>
The path length, number of marginally trusted keys required, and number
of fully trusted keys required may be adjusted.
The numbers given above are the default values used by GnuPG.</P
><P
><A
HREF="x335.htm#WOT-EXAMPLES"
>Figure 3-1</A
> shows a web of trust rooted at Alice.
The graph illustrates who has signed who's keys.
The table shows which keys Alice considers valid based on her
trust in the other members of the web.
This example assumes that two marginally-trusted keys or one
fully-trusted key is needed to validate another key.
The maximum path length is three.</P
><P
>When computing valid keys in the example, Blake and Dharma's are
always considered fully valid since they were signed directly
by Alice.
The validity of the other keys depends on trust.
In the first case, Dharma is trusted fully, which implies
that Chloe's and Francis's keys will be considered valid.
In the second example, Blake and Dharma are trusted marginally.
Since two marginally trusted keys are needed to fully validate a
key, Chloe's key will be considered fully valid, but Francis's
key will be considered only marginally valid.
In the case where Chloe and Dharma are marginally trusted,
Chloe's key will be marginally valid since Dharma's key is
fully valid.
Francis's key, however, will also be considered marginally
valid since only a fully valid key can be used to validate
other keys, and Dharma's key is the only fully valid key
that has been used to sign Francis's key.
When marginal trust in Blake is added, Chloe's key becomes
fully valid and can then be used to fully validate Francis's
key and marginally validate Elena's key.
Lastly, when Blake, Chloe, and Elena are fully trusted, this is
still insufficient to validate Geoff's key since the maximum
certification path is three, but the path length from Geoff
back to Alice is four.</P
><P
>The web of trust model is a flexible approach to the problem of safe
public key exchange.
It permits you to tune GnuPG to reflect how you use it.
At one extreme you may insist on multiple, short paths from your
key to another key <I
CLASS="EMPHASIS"
>K</I
> in order to trust it.
On the other hand, you may be satisfied with longer paths and
perhaps as little as one path from your key to the other
key <I
CLASS="EMPHASIS"
>K</I
>.
Requiring multiple, short paths is a strong guarantee
that <I
CLASS="EMPHASIS"
>K</I
> belongs to whom your think it does.
The price, of course, is that it is more difficult to validate keys
since you must personally sign more keys than if you accepted fewer
and longer paths.</P
><DIV
CLASS="FIGURE"
><A
NAME="WOT-EXAMPLES"
></A
><DIV
CLASS="MEDIAOBJECT"
><P
><IMG
SRC="signatures.jpg"></P
></DIV
><DIV
CLASS="INFORMALTABLE"
><P
></P
><A
NAME="AEN421"
></A
><TABLE
BORDER="1"
FRAME="border"
RULES="all"
CLASS="CALSTABLE"
><COL
WIDTH="1*"
TITLE="ONE"><COL
WIDTH="1*"
TITLE="TWO"><COL
WIDTH="1*"
TITLE="THREE"><COL
WIDTH="1*"
TITLE="FOUR"><THEAD
><TR
><TH
COLSPAN="2"
ALIGN="CENTER"
>trust</TH
><TH
COLSPAN="2"
ALIGN="CENTER"
>validity</TH
></TR
><TR
><TH
ALIGN="CENTER"
>marginal</TH
><TH
ALIGN="CENTER"
>full</TH
><TH
ALIGN="CENTER"
>marginal</TH
><TH
ALIGN="CENTER"
>full</TH
></TR
></THEAD
><TBODY
><TR
><TD
> </TD
><TD
>Dharma</TD
><TD
> </TD
><TD
>Blake, Chloe, Dharma, Francis</TD
></TR
><TR
><TD
>Blake, Dharma</TD
><TD
> </TD
><TD
>Francis</TD
><TD
>Blake, Chloe, Dharma</TD
></TR
><TR
><TD
>Chloe, Dharma</TD
><TD
> </TD
><TD
>Chloe, Francis</TD
><TD
>Blake, Dharma</TD
></TR
><TR
><TD
>Blake, Chloe, Dharma</TD
><TD
> </TD
><TD
>Elena</TD
><TD
>Blake, Chloe, Dharma, Francis</TD
></TR
><TR
><TD
> </TD
><TD
>Blake, Chloe, Elena</TD
><TD
> </TD
><TD
>Blake, Chloe, Elena, Francis</TD
></TR
></TBODY
></TABLE
><P
></P
></DIV
><P
><B
>Figure 3-1. A hypothetical web of trust</B
></P
></DIV
></DIV
></DIV
><H3
CLASS="FOOTNOTES"
>Notes</H3
><TABLE
BORDER="0"
CLASS="FOOTNOTES"
WIDTH="100%"
><TR
><TD
ALIGN="LEFT"
VALIGN="TOP"
WIDTH="5%"
><A
NAME="FTN.AEN378"
HREF="x335.htm#AEN378"
><SPAN
CLASS="footnote"
>[1]</SPAN
></A
></TD
><TD
ALIGN="LEFT"
VALIGN="TOP"
WIDTH="95%"
><P
>GnuPG overloads the word ``trust'' by using it to mean
trust in an owner and trust in a key.
This can be confusing.
Sometimes trust in an owner is referred to as
<I
CLASS="FIRSTTERM"
>owner-trust</I
> to
distinguish it from trust in a key.
Throughout this manual, however, ``trust'' is used to
mean trust in a key's
owner, and ``validity'' is used to mean trust that a key
belongs to the human associated with the key ID.</P
></TD
></TR
></TABLE
><DIV
CLASS="NAVFOOTER"
><HR
ALIGN="LEFT"
WIDTH="100%"><TABLE
SUMMARY="Footer navigation table"
WIDTH="100%"
BORDER="0"
CELLPADDING="0"
CELLSPACING="0"
><TR
><TD
WIDTH="33%"
ALIGN="left"
VALIGN="top"
><A
HREF="c236.htm"
ACCESSKEY="P"
>Prev</A
></TD
><TD
WIDTH="34%"
ALIGN="center"
VALIGN="top"
><A
HREF="book1.htm"
ACCESSKEY="H"
>Home</A
></TD
><TD
WIDTH="33%"
ALIGN="right"
VALIGN="top"
><A
HREF="x464.htm"
ACCESSKEY="N"
>Next</A
></TD
></TR
><TR
><TD
WIDTH="33%"
ALIGN="left"
VALIGN="top"
>Key Management</TD
><TD
WIDTH="34%"
ALIGN="center"
VALIGN="top"
><A
HREF="c236.htm"
ACCESSKEY="U"
>Up</A
></TD
><TD
WIDTH="33%"
ALIGN="right"
VALIGN="top"
>Distributing keys</TD
></TR
></TABLE
></DIV
></BODY
></HTML
>
|