/usr/share/doc/gnupg-doc/GNU_Privacy_Handbook/html/x216.htm is in gnupg-doc 2003.04.06+dak1-1ubuntu1.
This file is owned by root:root, with mode 0o644.
The actual contents of the file can be viewed below.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 | <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN""http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
<HTML
><HEAD
><TITLE
>Digital signatures</TITLE
><META
NAME="GENERATOR"
CONTENT="Modular DocBook HTML Stylesheet Version 1.79"><LINK
REL="HOME"
TITLE="The GNU Privacy Handbook"
HREF="book1.htm"><LINK
REL="UP"
TITLE="Concepts"
HREF="c174.htm"><LINK
REL="PREVIOUS"
TITLE="Hybrid ciphers"
HREF="x210.htm"><LINK
REL="NEXT"
TITLE="Key Management"
HREF="c236.htm"></HEAD
><BODY
CLASS="SECT1"
BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF"
TEXT="#000000"
LINK="#0000FF"
VLINK="#840084"
ALINK="#0000FF"
><DIV
CLASS="NAVHEADER"
><TABLE
SUMMARY="Header navigation table"
WIDTH="100%"
BORDER="0"
CELLPADDING="0"
CELLSPACING="0"
><TR
><TH
COLSPAN="3"
ALIGN="center"
>The GNU Privacy Handbook</TH
></TR
><TR
><TD
WIDTH="10%"
ALIGN="left"
VALIGN="bottom"
><A
HREF="x210.htm"
ACCESSKEY="P"
>Prev</A
></TD
><TD
WIDTH="80%"
ALIGN="center"
VALIGN="bottom"
>Chapter 2. Concepts</TD
><TD
WIDTH="10%"
ALIGN="right"
VALIGN="bottom"
><A
HREF="c236.htm"
ACCESSKEY="N"
>Next</A
></TD
></TR
></TABLE
><HR
ALIGN="LEFT"
WIDTH="100%"></DIV
><DIV
CLASS="SECT1"
><H1
CLASS="SECT1"
><A
NAME="AEN216"
>Digital signatures</A
></H1
><P
>A hash function is a many-to-one function that maps its input to a
value in a finite set.
Typically this set is a range of natural numbers.
A simple hash function is <I
CLASS="EMPHASIS"
>f</I
>(<I
CLASS="EMPHASIS"
>x</I
>) = 0
for all integers <I
CLASS="EMPHASIS"
>x</I
>.
A more interesting hash function is
<I
CLASS="EMPHASIS"
>f</I
>(<I
CLASS="EMPHASIS"
>x</I
>) = <I
CLASS="EMPHASIS"
>x</I
>
<I
CLASS="EMPHASIS"
>mod</I
> 37, which
maps <I
CLASS="EMPHASIS"
>x</I
> to the remainder of dividing <I
CLASS="EMPHASIS"
>x</I
> by 37.</P
><P
>A document's digital signature is the result of applying a hash
function to the document.
To be useful, however, the hash function needs to satisfy two
important properties.
First, it should be hard to find two documents that hash to the
same value.
Second, given a hash value it should be hard to recover the document
that produced that value.</P
><P
>Some public-key ciphers<A
NAME="AEN230"
HREF="#FTN.AEN230"
><SPAN
CLASS="footnote"
>[1]</SPAN
></A
> could be used to sign documents.
The signer encrypts the document with his <I
CLASS="EMPHASIS"
>private</I
> key.
Anybody wishing to check the signature and see the document simply
uses the signer's public key to decrypt the document.
This algorithm does satisfy the two properties needed from a good hash
function, but in practice, this algorithm is too slow to be useful.</P
><P
>An alternative is to use hash functions designed to satisfy these
two important properties.
SHA and MD5 are examples of such algorithms.
Using such an algorithm, a document is signed by hashing it, and
the hash value is the signature.
Another person can check the signature by also hashing their copy of the
document and comparing the hash value they get with the hash value of
the original document.
If they match, it is almost certain that the documents are identical.</P
><P
>Of course, the problem now is using a hash function for digital
signatures without permitting an attacker to interfere with signature
checking.
If the document and signature are sent unencrypted, an attacker could
modify the document and generate a corresponding signature without the
recipient's knowledge.
If only the document is encrypted, an attacker could tamper with the
signature and cause a signature check to fail.
A third option is to use a hybrid public-key encryption to encrypt both
the signature and document.
The signer uses his private key, and anybody can use his public key
to check the signature and document.
This sounds good but is actually nonsense.
If this algorithm truly secured the document it would also
secure it from tampering and there would be no need for the signature.
The more serious problem, however, is that this does not protect either
the signature or document from tampering.
With this algorithm, only the session key for the symmetric cipher
is encrypted using the signer's private key.
Anybody can use the public key to recover the session key.
Therefore, it is straightforward for an attacker to recover the session
key and use it to encrypt substitute documents and signatures to send
to others in the sender's name.</P
><P
>An algorithm that does work is to use a public key algorithm to
encrypt only the signature.
In particular, the hash value is encrypted using the signer's private
key, and anybody can check the signature using the public key.
The signed document can be sent using any other encryption algorithm
including none if it is a public document.
If the document is modified the signature check will fail, but this
is precisely what the signature check is supposed to catch.
The Digital Signature Standard (DSA) is a public key signature
algorithm that works as just described.
DSA is the primary signing algorithm used in GnuPG.</P
></DIV
><H3
CLASS="FOOTNOTES"
>Notes</H3
><TABLE
BORDER="0"
CLASS="FOOTNOTES"
WIDTH="100%"
><TR
><TD
ALIGN="LEFT"
VALIGN="TOP"
WIDTH="5%"
><A
NAME="FTN.AEN230"
HREF="x216.htm#AEN230"
><SPAN
CLASS="footnote"
>[1]</SPAN
></A
></TD
><TD
ALIGN="LEFT"
VALIGN="TOP"
WIDTH="95%"
><P
>The cipher must have the property that the actual public key or private
key could be used by the encryption algorithm as the public key.
RSA is an example of such an algorithm while ElGamal is not an example.</P
></TD
></TR
></TABLE
><DIV
CLASS="NAVFOOTER"
><HR
ALIGN="LEFT"
WIDTH="100%"><TABLE
SUMMARY="Footer navigation table"
WIDTH="100%"
BORDER="0"
CELLPADDING="0"
CELLSPACING="0"
><TR
><TD
WIDTH="33%"
ALIGN="left"
VALIGN="top"
><A
HREF="x210.htm"
ACCESSKEY="P"
>Prev</A
></TD
><TD
WIDTH="34%"
ALIGN="center"
VALIGN="top"
><A
HREF="book1.htm"
ACCESSKEY="H"
>Home</A
></TD
><TD
WIDTH="33%"
ALIGN="right"
VALIGN="top"
><A
HREF="c236.htm"
ACCESSKEY="N"
>Next</A
></TD
></TR
><TR
><TD
WIDTH="33%"
ALIGN="left"
VALIGN="top"
>Hybrid ciphers</TD
><TD
WIDTH="34%"
ALIGN="center"
VALIGN="top"
><A
HREF="c174.htm"
ACCESSKEY="U"
>Up</A
></TD
><TD
WIDTH="33%"
ALIGN="right"
VALIGN="top"
>Key Management</TD
></TR
></TABLE
></DIV
></BODY
></HTML
>
|